Advertising through social media is almost unavoidable in today’s digital environment. But for businesses who may be more budget conscious, there is a choice to be made over which social media platform to advertise on. Two of the biggest options to consider are Facebook and Twitter. But which one is the better option for your business?
The first thing to consider is how each platform’s ads actually work. While they are both fairly similar, there are subtle differences:
How Facebook Ads work: Facebook Ads is a bidding system which changes as a result of your objective, bidding strategy and targeting. You pay either by clicks or impressions, which means you have to decide if you want to pay for results or views.
How Twitter Ads works: Similarly, with Twitter you set a budget, bid and run and campaign. Unlike Facebook, with Twitter you only pay when a user takes an action aligned with your campaign objective.
To find out, it’s best to look at criteria that is applicable to both platforms:
When you’re looking to start out a campaign, the first choice for businesses is often Facebook. After all, Facebook has 1.79 billion active monthly users, while Twitter averages 317 million active monthly users. This is a significant difference, and it’s easy to see why businesses would therefore choose Facebook as their preferred platform. However, this does not consider which platform your target audience uses.
However, there is more to consider than just numbers. Recently, Facebook’s audience has been changing, with an increase in the 50-plus years old demographic, rather than millennials. When analysing Twitter’s audience, the majority are under 40 years old. So while Facebook has a far larger amount of users, your target audience may not actually be using the medium, and you may achieve better results with Twitter. It’s important to undertake research into your target market and their demographics prior to starting a campaign.
Facebook defines organic reach as “how many people you can reach for free on Facebook by posting to your Page.” Facebook’s organic reach has been rapidly decreasing since 2012. In fact, Edgerank Checker undertook a study that found between February 2012 and March 2014, organic reach for Facebook Pages dropped from 16% to 6.5%.
This drop in organic reach can be attributed to the constantly increasing amount of content on timelines. It’s simply harder for businesses to be seen than it was previously. This ultimately means there are less clicks, conversions and sales for a business. This also encourages businesses to invest in ads, rather than relying solely on organic reach.
Meanwhile, Twitter has the opposite problem. It is very easy to miss something on Twitter, especially if you follow a lot of accounts. However, a change in their algorithm in early 2016 made it easier for businesses to expand their organic reach. This was due to the introduction of the “what you may have missed” feature, which is an expansion on the “while you were away” feature, introduced in 2015.
The feature meant Twitter overhauled its old algorithm, and started to reward better content. Twitter’s algorithm takes into account what type of account and tweets a person usually interacts with, any trends they would follow and what they tweet about. This did not promote paid-for ads, but rather just organic posts.
Therefore, it would seem it is easier for an organic post on Twitter to be placed at the top of a timeline than with Facebook.
With both platforms, there is no set price, but rather the price depends on your bidding price and budget.
Twitter Ads is an auction-based system. There is no minimum, and businesses will only be charged when they acquire an action (the action varying depending on your campaign objective). Twitter has two options in determining how to set bids for campaigns:
There are various campaign types, including:
While prices vary, Twitter suggests a starting point of $1.50 for tweets and $2.50 for follows.
Facebook also doesn’t have a set price, and the total cost will depend on your budget. The Salesforce Advertising Index Q3 2015 found that for every $65 you put into Facebook, you will get about 100 clicks. This means every click will cost US$0.65. However, this will vary depending on your budget, and what industry the business is in.
Entertainment industries are the cheapest, with the likely reason being because they have a large audience and the ads are appealing. Professional services, such as doctors and lawyers, have a far more niche market and therefore will have higher prices for ads. While these professions may have to pay more, Facebook Ads are the more cost-effective option, as it is much cheaper than Twitter.
Wordstream found that Facebook is far cheaper than Twitter for cost per 1000 likes - Facebook costs $0.59, while Twitter costs $3.50. Seeing this vast difference in cost would make you assume Facebook is the most cost-effective option.
However, this is not the case. When you compare the average click-through rate, Facebook’s sits at 0.119%, while Twitter sits at 1-3%.
A reason for this result is that Twitter appears to benefit from its ads being “in-stream” - that is the ads are displayed in the timeline, rather than on the side of it, as is the case with Facebook.
Mobile is becoming the increasingly popular way to access both Facebook and Twitter. Facebook has 1.66 billion mobile monthly active users, with 56.5% of users only logging in on a mobile device.
Twitter has approximately 257 million mobile monthly active users, which accounts for 82% of total monthly active users. It is clear to see that mobile optimisation is an important factor for both platforms. However, because of Facebook’s far greater audience, this platform may be preferable for mobile ads.
Facebook has a variety of ads, depending on your objective.
For sales and leads for your product or service, it’s best to use:
For traffic and leads for your website, consider:
For likes and engagement on your Facebook page, use:
Twitter ads are referred to as “Twitter Cards.” Twitter has nine types of ads, with enough variety to suit every business:
Twitter created Objective Based Campaigns to help you select the correct card to achieve your business goals.
Both platforms have similar ad formats and have a large range to chose from, so it’s hard to declare one better than the other with this criteria.
Using either platform won’t be effective if you don’t target correctly. So what options are there?
Facebook has six targeting options, which are:
This is the option to select when you are entering a new market or targeting people who have not heard of your brand before.
Twitter has nine targeting options, with a few different options than Facebook:
Going by the criteria we have discussed here, it’s easy to lean towards Facebook as the preferred platform.
In the end, we can’t tell you which option is better for your business. Facebook has a far greater number of users, so your ad will be seen by a larger audience, on both desktop and mobile. Twitter has a better organic reach, but is also the more expensive platform to have a paid advertisement on. However, this cost could pay off, as Twitter has a higher click-through rate. Both platforms have fairly similar ad formats and targeting options. However, going by the criteria we have discussed here, it’s easy to lean towards Facebook as the preferred platform, as it is more economical and offers a far larger audience.
Disagree? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.